World Bank Q of 2015: Where do citizens (and half of world under 29) have a sustainable role in the future?

You can find this debate at the world bank mooc on citizen engagement -  the bank appears to say that you need to register (free and about 2 minute process) before mid april - but can then be a full course alumni among 100000 peers and networker for a year

You can engage personally in this debate with me chris.macrae@yaoo.co.uk washington dc at any time -cheers!
=========================
1) Over the last 3 years the world bank has clarified what role will make young professionals (and so humanity's next 15 years of #2030now) exponentially sustainable celebrating the joy of the Preferential Option Poor model that young health professional have tested in pioneering global social value of alt over 30 years and which end-poverty cultural segments of eg the catholic church (starting in south americas of late 1960s) but which Pope Francis will lead yo congress on 24 september. 

So this is all transparent, exciting, a whole truth pathway back to sustainability.Moreover  this model has proven extremely timely -it was essential -and servant leadership heroically critical - for the last mile professional capacity (love, courage and trust networking) needed to combat ebola

2) Less clearly actionable but worthy is public servant (open society and whole truth leadership research) such as that by Ibrahim foundation for africa, and sometimes implied by transparency international though as little as I am informed without a practice case like young professionals can see for health

3) My point is that the role you can inspire citizens to engage  depends on other 2 groups who start with much more power, resources, decision-making (or knowledge) the way old (and non-sustainable) national systems spun the pre-digital, pre-mobile highly bordered 20th century whose industrial mindset came to value owning things and power over carbon energy more than freeing people livelihoods (see www.futureofeconomics.com if in doubt)

Over the last 25 years starting with big 5 consultant firms in london I have examined the maths of all sorts of stakeholder models of global social value mentored until 2010 by my father a Keysnian economists who first journalised the struggles the net generation would have to be sustainable in The Economist of the 1970s. None are valid unless as a minimum they explain triad interactions. The reason being when you develop a theory for one- unless its the one that is already most powerful it as no chance of transformation on its own . When you look at two at a time, the issue is that one will always dominate the other over time. You need a third balancing dynamic (that's if you are asking all to transform  back to a sustainable orbit) so that each can mediate the other two

I dont see how this course relates to the rest of what the world bank has opened up since JIm Kim took office. I look forward to hearing from one world bank staffer who can inform me/us. Meanwhile if you are interested in this or other triad models in which citizens have an equal valuation role please say.

 Equally if you are just a humble mathematician - you are my home clan - love to hear from you any time. Its a strange computational world- one billion times more analytical capacity than when man raced to the moon but drowning in analyses tat neither of my family's greatest open system heroes Einstein nor Von Neumann would bother grading.